Introducing Pastology in Philosophy of Law

I have a new paper out in legal theory. It concerns my first book.

https://ssrn.com/abstract=3232204

Abstract: Scholars of legal theory must stop using the phrase “original meaning” when suggesting how we should read undefined legal text. Instead, the term “pastology” or “pastological exegesis” should be used. We have an obligation not to mislead our audience. Whenever legal text is undefined and an advocate puts forth a candidate for more specific meaning based upon a marshaling of the past (floor speeches, letters, old dictionaries, etc.), this is an exegetical behavior known in philosophy of law as pastology.

The Legacy of Antonin Scalia

This content has moved here: http://seanwilson.org/Blog/show.php?i=16214221109

Wittgenstein and the Flexible Constitution

I want to thank professor Coyle for his thoughtful consideration of my book. His effort and comments are of a profound kind. I offer, in reply, three quick points that I hope will contribute to the wonderful clarity that he has provided.

Click to read more ...