Finding Stuff
American Politics (3) Analytic Philosophy (6) announcement (13) Antonin Scalia (1) audio (5) Bertrand Russell (1) Bill Maher (1) brain chemicals (1) Christmas (2) Colonial Williamsburg (1) common space scores (1) composition (40) conference (1) Dennis Coyle (1) dessert (2) Dick Morris (1) Dualism (1) elections (1) e-mail discussion (62) faculty senate (1) family resemblance (1) fashion (2) Father Jocelyn (2) free will (1) Godzilla (3) gospels (1) hair (12) Hilton Head (1) identity politics (2) Igloo (1) image (31) Iraq (1) Jesus (1) Jocelyn (3) John Austin (2) John McEnroe (1) Kolshak (1) Language (1) language games (1) Law & Ideology (41) Lectures (2) Legal Theory (35) Liar's Paradox (1) Lies (1) Marriage (1) mathematics (1) Me (17) MIssouri (1) moral philosophy (1) Mothers Day (1) my family (2) necklace (1) Obama (1) Oliver Wendell Holmes (3) oral tradition (1) Originalism (4) Paul Horwich (1) Pedagogy (1) pedagogy (1) Philosophy of Intelligence (8) Philosophy of Love (2) Philosophy of Math (1) Physicalism (1) Piero Sraffa (1) Pittsburgh Penguins (1) Political Philosophy (1) politicology (8) polls (1) pragmatism (1) presidency (1) Presidential Campaign (1) Quantitative Ideology Models (26) Quantitative Methods (28) question (1) realism (2) Religion (3) Republicans (1) Robert Dahl (1) Robert DiClerico (1) Rolling Stones (1) Ronald Dworkin (4) sampling (1) scholarship (2) science (1) Segal & Spaeth (18) sense/reference (1) sociological jurisprudence (1) Star Trek (1) stats (1) Supreme Court (7) Supreme Court (1) Tennis (1) The Club (8) The Flexible Constitution (6) Tractatus (3) Transporter (1) Upcoming Projects (1) video (10) wealth (1) weird expression (1) Wittgenstein (22)
This area does not yet contain any content.
This area does not yet contain any content.
This area does not yet contain any content.
« The Legacy of Antonin Scalia | Main | The Age of Intoleration is Upon Us »
Friday
Jan082016

Free Will: The False Debate

Replying to this: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160104130826.htm

This whole debate is so ridiculous. There is nothing in science that could ever say whether choice is voluntary. It could only provide physical explanations for the way choice is constituted. Even if why we choose were said to be socially embedded, or latent, all that could be done, through therapy, is to give a person a heightened perspicuity for this as a phenomenon. It would be the same as giving a student a sense of ethics. To do anything more in this domain is to spread confusion.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>