What Is This?
Stuart W. Mirsky
Kirby Urner
Join Us!
Help

Stuart W. Mirsky (Stuart W. Mirsky is the principal author of this blog).
Last 10 Entries:

Sean Wilson's Blog:


Ludwig Wittgenstein:

 For me, Scalia was a terrible judge. And he was terrible because his decisions relied upon intellectual behaviors that were dominant in history at least one century prior to his time on the bench. He used an a-priori format, syllogistic reasoning, formalism, and took positions about ...
... pretty good stuff here. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/03/was-wittgenstein-right/?_r=1 But here is my only complaint. Characterizing Wittgenstein's negative attitudes about the field of philosophy, Horwich writes: " There are no startling discoveries to be made ... 'from the armchair' through some blend of intuition, pure reason and ...
... open access special edition published. Looks promising. Anna Boncompagni is one of the authors.
This looks interesting. The way they have framed the issue looks very good. The question is whether the idea of connoisseurship will even enter the picture at all (as it should). The book I am working on now will expand upon this idea. Why do I ...
I am seeking feedback on the enclosed proposal. I wonder if people think it looks like a viable project? Would the thesis of such a book interest you? Basically, the book is a bit personal: it's based upon an intellectual transformation that I went through and ...
... new set of lectures was posted today. It's on Wittgenstein and Philosophy. Will have the final set of lectures, called Wittgenstein on Intelligence, up tomorrow (hopefully). Moore & His Hands Form of Life False Problems Example: Free Will Senses of Knowledge On Definitions Gettier & Banality Alternative Lexicons On ...
... a lecture containing Wittgensteinian approaches to language. Specifically covers precision-talking, names, jargon, family resemblance, senses of talking -- you name it, it's there. http://ludwig.squarespace.com/cond6/
In this lecture, we see Wittgenstein shed the Tractarian orientation and adopt something that he would later call "the new thinking." http://ludwig.squarespace.com/cond5/
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Italian economist Piero Sraffa is credited with causing Wittgenstein to adopt an "anthropological perspective" toward language. One of conversations between the two involved Sraffa's using a "Neapolitan gesture." This video shows how gestures of this sort lack a picture-reality correspondence, which caused Wittgenstein to abandon the ...
Not enough attention is given to Wittgenstein shunning his immense inheritance. What is interesting is that he did this as a young man and showed no indication throughout life to have ever regretted it. It would be one thing to see someone in their later years ...
... new lecture uploaded on Wittgenstein in transition. Has some clips from A.J. Ayer on Logical Positivism. But, overall, nothing too special here: just a hand-waiving lecture. http://ludwig.squarespace.com/cond4/2014/2/20/01-logical-positivism.html
Wittgenstein's example of philosophical scholarship shews an arrogant and radical ideology hiding inside. Wittgenstein wasn't a worker bee slaving for a literature community. He wasn't a member of the "club." He understood that a "company man" could never be a great thinker. Today, however, the academy ...
... just finished putting my newest version of the Tractatus lecture online. Some audio clips are old, however, because my batteries died in the middle of one session. Still, it is pieced together (reconstructed) accurately. http://ludwig.squarespace.com/cond3/2014/1/29/01-the-genesis-of.html
"The world is the totality of facts, not of things," Wittgenstein proclaims in the Tractatus. In this video, this idea is explained. Specifically, the idea of a thought being a picture of a possible state of affairs, for which the proposition claims to be true or ...
There is an old thread on this subject which has been revived on Duncan Richter's blog. You might want to have a look: http://languagegoesonholiday.blogspot.com/2012/11/did-wittgenstein-believe-in-god.html
I've never seen this before. I wonder if anyone can comment on when it was taken? Or the circumstances? He sort of reminds me of Elvis in this one. Click the picture to see where it came from.
A lecture that looks at Bertrand Russell, the analytic movement that he and Gottlob Frege nurtured, and the role that early Ludwig Wittgenstein played. The lecture takes us from Wittgenstein's first year at Cambridge, when he was captured by Russell's analytic patriotism, through to his departure ...
http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2013/11/the-stereotypes-about-math-that-hold-americans-back/281303/ ... article seems to support the idea that traditional and formalistic approaches to mathematics were themselves an unnecessary dressing. If true, an interesting idea: one that has resonance with the notion that meaning is more important than analysis and that "getting it" is something different ...
(sent to analytic re: whether misplaying in a "language game" is a matter of breaching an implied customary rule for communication. Here's the quick answer: the idea is too anthropologic and needs something ideational) ... I am so happy you brought this up. Because this is exactly what ...
    
Search Archives:
Every Entry
Categories
Tags

Duncan Richter's Blog:

The review is here. Thankfully, even though it does mention me, it doesn't say anything bad about my contribution. (Perhaps tactfully, it says almost nothing at all about it.) Here's a taste of the review: This volume is a valuable addition to this growing literature, with a lucid ...
These are all just coincidences, I suppose, but there are some striking similarities between some of Wittgenstein's acts and ideas and elements of War and Peace. Here are three. The Tractatus contains seven main propositions, which are to be overcome in order to see the ...
One of my favorite authors on why fiction is not a distraction from reality. Here's a taste: The night time dream is chaotic and can be genuinely frightening. The dream we call life is filled with joy and suffering, but for many people a lot more ...
It seems paradoxical to write the question, "Does writing exist?" but what I mean is: is there some thing called writing that someone can be good or bad at, teach, or simply do? According to John Warner, we know how to teach writing. But what is ...
This Guardian essay on neoliberalism is frustrating in some ways (too cloudy at key points, and too prone to ad hominem insults), but it's interesting, and brings out the importance of Friedrich von Hayek, whose work probably ought to be engaged with more just because it ...
Moving to this country was the the first time I ever flew in a plane. I landed in Charlottesville, where I lived for five years. I still live just over an hour's drive from there, and go there quite often to eat a meal, do some ...
This looks interesting, in terms of both content and the decision to publish free and online. The title is Pictorial Truth: Essays on Wittgenstein, Realism, and Conservatism, and it's by Kristóf Nyíri. He writes: I am really curious how the scholarly world will react e.g. to ...
My friend Chris Gavaler has co-written a piece with Nathaniel Goldberg on Trump and bullshit for Philosophy Now. If you're interested in this subject then, obviously, you might want to read it. Their conclusion is that a sample of Trump's speech is "beyond bullshit." Here's ...
I talked a bit about Stephen Mulhall's The Great Riddle here and here. This is the last post I intend to write about it, and it's about the part of the book I like the most. Near the end, Mulhall refers to "the sheer wild particularity ...
[What follows is little more than a bunch of quotes strung together. But they are good quotes.] The desirability of seeing what is under our noses and thereby becoming free is a bit of a theme in 19th century European thought. Here's Father ...
Perhaps this isn't worth a blog post, but it's not as if I've been posting much otherwise. Sometimes it's better to have low standards. So here goes. Two things strike me as not just true but obviously true about any increase in the legal minimum ...
This paper needs quite a bit of work, but for anyone interested here is an only very slightly (so far) revised version of the paper I presented at the conference on Peter Winch last weekend in London.
If you're interested in Peter Winch on understanding others, you might be interested in this documentary. Perhaps it's well known, but I only just found it: And here's one on Evans-Pritchard: I haven't watched either one yet, so can't guarantee their quality.
A new issue (Vol 6 No 1 (2017)) is available here.
Some questions that you might want to ask Stephen Mulhall when you read his new book: if talk about God is nonsense, why bother?if talk about God has a use, mustn't it thereby have a meaning after all?if you accept that nonsense is nonsense, that there ...
Just in case anyone's interested, I've revised this paper. The new version is here.
Are there any bad ones? These are the best, and only, three I know: "Woody Allen" by Allo Darlin', "What's Yr Take on Cassavetes" by Le Tigre, and "Roman P" by Psychic TV. The videos aren't very exciting, but the performances are ...
This site looks great. It is designed to be a teaching resource for people who teach philosophy but want to diverge from the usual texts and topics taught. So if you want to teach some Asian philosophy, for instance, this site will (it is not yet complete) ...
I'm enjoying Stephen Mulhall's The Great Riddle very much. Here he is on religious language: ...insofar as God is the source of all that is, possessing in his being all the perfections he causes, then everything in creation is a potential source of imagery for the ...
Matthew Yglesias has an interesting essay on Trump and bullshit at Vox, but I think he goes too far in his attempt to explain what's going on. Here's an example: When Trump says something like he’s just learned that Barack Obama ordered his phones wiretapped, he’s ...
« About Belief | Main | Pragmatism in a Modern Register »
11:40AM

Intelligence and Minds

I was doing my regular workout the other day, the kind of karate practice I’ve been doing since my twenties, when, in the middle of a form I was working through, a fly whizzed by my head. I’m no fan of flies, at least in the house, because of the diseases they transport as they light on different surfaces, so I stopped what I was doing and followed his trail. I caught up with him as he came to rest on the window of our back door and took a couple of quick swipes at him. The sun was coming in through the window so he probably didn't "know" I was behind him. Still, he was fast and it took me three tries to bring him down. And on the third shot, I wasn't even sure I'd got him till I found him, still alive, crawling on the floor at my feet. He was still fast and I had to move quickly to catch him and then press hard enough to crush him. Insects are pretty tough and can withstand a lot of pressure from the human finger or hand. But I got him in the end and, after placing his carcass in the garbage and washing my hands, I went back to my workout.

But almost as soon as I'd begun the next form (after restarting and finishing the one I'd interrupted), I was disconcerted to see another fly, just like the first, buzzing about. I tried to push myself to finish the form I was into until I saw the little bugger light on another window, near where I was practicing, and so I stopped again and carefully approached him. I don't know if this one was quicker than the first or the light wasn't in my favor in that part of the house but he got away.

Still, he was drawn to the light and the sun shining through the window seemed to keep calling him back. I started and stopped the form I’d been concentrating on several times, cutting it short each time that second fly landed on the window shades and then, each time, I’d approach it as stealthily as I could. But this one was quick and the light was probably not in my favor. But something else noticeable was happening. This one seemed to be learning.

Now flies don't have much in the way of brains and we humans are pretty sure that the brain matters when it comes to smarts. Yet this tiny creature, whose brain was orders of magnitude smaller than mine, with far fewer cells and less complexity in its structure, seemed to not only be becoming increasingly aware of my presence, he actually seemed to anticipate me. That's something we usually associate with intelligence.

The last time I thought I had him cornered I got really close, close enough to see him rubbing his legs together as he rested on the window shade and then, as I approached (my guess is he caught sight of a big shadow moving on him) he stopped rubbing his legs and seemed to ready himself, waiting. When I struck again, he was gone in a flash. He had not only reacted with the sort of fly-reflex his kind possesses to steer clear of bigger monsters like me, he was waiting and seemed to be gauging his moment. Of course, I missed again. But this guy seemed to have learned something from our several brief encounters. He refused to alight again, flying about, sometimes right past my head but not going near the windows and certainly not landing. And mostly giving me a wide berth. He was clearly agitated by something. My presence? Had he learned, with his tiny insect brain?

Certainly there is no evidence he thought about his situation as a human might but he did seem to be anticipating me and he did seem to have learned where danger lay for him. Now perhaps this is just anthropomorphocizing on my part. I certainly don't want to impute anything like human consciousness to my miniscule antagonist, but it hit me that there was something going on here that did not look entirely like mere stimulus-response. There was an entity before me in a situation and responding to it, to the threat it posed. Surely that fly had no idea about what a human was or why the human was trying to kill it and, probably, it had no idea that it was facing its death at all. But it knew something and it learned something and learning is the first measure of intelligence. Thermostats can respond to signals from their environment but do not learn anything about them. But that little fly learned.

So, what is intelligence? We humans often think of it as being able to recognize changes and plan our actions accordingly. We have language so we talk to ourselves, too, tell ourselves stories about what’s going on. We can conceptualize our situations. At a deeper level, especially in the martial arts, humans train themselves in ways that recall the fly’s behavior. The practice of martial arts or any activity in sport or real life involves conditioning our bodies through the awareness having a body involves. In the martial arts, like the karate I practice, we train to be one with the environment of combat. The point is not to plan our actions ahead of time or to try to plan our next response to whatever attack is coming our way, but to teach ourselves to allow our bodies to feel and respond to the danger. In a real combat situation, there's no time to take stock of the strike or kick or tackle that's coming at you. It just happens and if you've trained well enough, so does your response. Years ago, confronted by an armed assailant in a darkened schoolyard playground at night without any lights, a place I had foolishly decided to cross (it was a shortcut home!) despite seeing two men sitting in the shadows there with both looking at me and talking quietly at sight of me and then rising, as I entered the area, and walking deliberately towards me, I had faced the sort of danger the fly was facing. Like that first fly, and maybe even the second, I was insufficiently aware of the danger as I entered the schoolyard though I had plenty of information to enable me to have anticipated it. But I was still processing the situation when one of the men ran toward me, a gun in his hand, shoving it in my face as he demanded my money.

Like the fly, my body responded, though my mind, the thinking part anyway, was still trying to parse my predicament. As the gun entered my space, I knocked it from my assailant's hand. Just as the fly had sped away as I reached towards it, so my hand removed the immediate threat of the weapon to my person. My assailant was nonplussed and what happened after is another story but the relevant part here is that my body, having trained for some eight years by then in the martial arts, had developed a kind of intelligence all its own. It knew, though my thinking brain did not quite get it yet, that there was, as the robot puts it in the series Lost in Space, "Danger, Will Robinson" and I was Will Robinson. Martial arts training at its best aims to teach the body to do what the thinking brain cannot. It aims to make the body smart in the way creatures in the wild are smart . . . and in the way that fly in my house was.

But how explain the fly's ability to learn so quickly, to seemingly anticipate and then avoid putting itself in danger again? Reflex attuned by eons of evolutionary development perhaps, the sort of thing all creatures possess though humans have to train themselves to bring back to the surface? But what then is intelligence? Is it being able speak a language, solve a math problem, build a bridge? Is it knowing how to play chess well? Is it only a function of sufficiently large and complex brains?

Or is it something else, something deeply embedded in the universe itself, of which we are all a part? What if intelligence is built into the very fabric of the universe? What if having big brains is only one expression of it? What if evolution, itself, is intelligence? Maybe we go wrong when we think of the universe in a merely mechanical way, as if it were just a naturally occurring super-duper thermostat. Maybe the fly has intelligence because it is an expression of the universe itself and we are, as well, though, as humans, with concept forming (and using) brains, we lose sight of this deeper fact about ourselves.

Maybe intelligence runs through everything in the universe and finds expression in different ways. In us it's brains with the power of language and the conceptualizing capacity language enables. But in flies, perhaps it's something else. In the end we're all part of the same fabric of existence and who knows what part of it, or how much of it, humanity really represents . . . or how long we can hang around to compete with the fly?

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>