Entries by admin (9)
Final Installment of Wittgenstein Lectures
Sean Wilson has posted the remaining lectures in his Wittgenstein course. You need a flash player to hear the slides talk. Ipad users may want to try an app called photon. The three final topics are:
Wittgenstein On Philosophy
New lectures on Wittgenstein and Philosophy have been posted by Sean Wilson. You need a flash player to listen to them, which means Ipad users can only do it with an app (see Photon). Here's the link:
Wittgenstein on PhilosophyTwo Lectures on Wittgenstein (Nuno Venturinha)
The publication of Wittgenstein’s Nachlass has made clear that what is generally regarded as his second philosophical masterpiece, the Philosophical Investigations, is in fact an unfinished book. There are many other examples of unfinished books in the western tradition and Wittgenstein’s book would seem to fall under the category of works whose authors could not finish in their lifetimes. I shall discuss some of these examples and show that there is something peculiar regarding Wittgenstein’s enterprise, specifically that the unfinished nature of his book mirrors his view of philosophy as an unfinishable task. I shall conclude by ... suggest[ing] that this does not mean completely abandoning substantial theses.
Consciousness Without Inner Models ...
There has been much criticism over the years of the idea that conscious experience depends on inner representational models of the environment. Enactive accounts (e.g. Thompson 2007) and the sensorimotor account more particularly (O’Regan & Noë 2001; O’Regan 2011) have prominently criticized the reliance on inner models and they have offered an alternative way of thinking about experience. The idea of sensorimotor approaches is that experience involves the perceiver’s attunement to the way in which sensory stimulation depends on action. But how then should we conceive of what happens in the agent’s head to allow for this attunement? In this symposium we focus on two questions. First, how does an enactive sensorimotor theory offer guidance for the interpretation of neurophysiological findings? Second, how are its predictions about neural processes different from the predictions of representationalist accounts?
Wittgenstein Wins Contest
http://critical-theory.com/greatest-philosopher-all-google/